Newborn blood testing without parental consent


Another way your health freedom is being taken away – through your child…

Doctor Vaccinating Child Baby Flu Injection Shot IST. PAUL, Minn.—The U.S. House of Representatives will vote on Tuesday on the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Reauthorization Act of 2014 (H.R.1281), which would extend for five years the funding program that allows states to collect and store newborn DNA without parental consent.

Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom Urges Opposition to Bill that Grants Government Ownership of Newborn DNA

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA-40) is purportedly meant to improve health for newborns and children by allowing for detection of potentially life- and health-threatening genetic conditions.

But Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF,, a Minnesota-based national organization dedicated to preserving patient-centered health care and protecting patient and privacy rights, says the legislation is a back-door effort to bypass parental rights, collect and store newborn DNA and expand government access to the genetic code of Americans.

“In the name of public health, this legislation continues a program that strips parents of their right to have a say in who holds their child’s genetic code, strips children of their privacy and property rights, and institutionalizes national data-sharing among federal and state governments,” said CCHF co-founder and president Twila Brase. “It’s one thing for newborn blood samples to be tested for a specific set of newborn genetic conditions; it’s entirely another for the government to grant itself the right to store that data and those DNA samples indefinitely, to use them for genetic research without parental knowledge or consent, and to place virtual tracking devices on every child by following their health history into adolescence. Yet, these are exactly what this bill does.”

CCHF’s analysis of the legislation uncovered multiple red flags, including:

1)No Consent Requirement. The bill requires no parental consent for long-term follow-up into adolescence, for government surveillance and access to medical records, for government data-sharing and for research using newborn data (DNA, genetic test results). 

2)Long-Term Surveillance. The bill authorizes a demonstration program to evaluate followup of “newborns and children at risk for heritable disorders” into adolescence. This is purportedly to assess “health and development outcomes,” but in actuality, it is government health tracking.

3)Nationalized Newborn Screening. The bill authorizes federal coordination of state newborn screening surveillance activities, including federal standardization of data collection and reporting, as well as the use of electronic medical records for surveillance and data-sharing.

4)Intrusive Labeling, Profiling and Sharing.  Under the bill, federal sharing of data on newborns (including perhaps, newborn genetic test results, newborn DNA and mother's genetic and other data) would be shared with state birth defect and developmental disability surveillance programs.

5)Genetic Research on Newborns. The bill allows research and data-sharing using newborn data and blood specimens (newborn DNA) for conditions not yet included in the newborn screening test panel.

6)Genetic Testing of Newborns for Conditions Not Yet Determined Appropriate for Newborn Screening. The bill authorizes pilot programs to ensure that these not-yet-approved genetic tests “are ready for nationwide implementation.”

7)$99.5 Million Price Tag. The bill authorizes $99.5 million in appropriations.


Deborah Hamilton, Hamilton Strategies, 215.815.7716, 610.584.1096,





Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *